The feedback in terms of rating various categories 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) was as follows:
How would you rate gathering as a whole: 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 4, 5. (10 answers)
How would you rate Woodbrooke as a whole: 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5. (10 answers)

Events
Welcome/intro: 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 2/3, 4, 4, na, 5. (9 answers)
Keynotes: 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 3/4, 4, 4/5, – , 5. (9answers)
Short talks/discussions: 4, na, 4, 2, – , 2/3, 4, 4, 2, 4. (8 answers)
Social evening: 4, na, 4, – , – , – , – , 4, – , 5. (5 answers)

The feedback in ‘your own words’ sections were also generally very positive and some sample comments were:
Interactions with new people, sharing the garden with a friend, I found all the presentations extremely interesting/love the place/grounds/setting/Bourneville/weather/Carillion, the opening getting-to-know-you-session, talks and trip to Carillon, Fellowship and sharing.

On the keynote speakers:
variety added to interest/all 3 excellent. Feedback on these was variable (longhand) from none to long! Where present all were positive. Least positive was one comment on Tony’s presentation ‘Not so relevant – Quaker universalist PR’. Several comments on strength of variety and balance – the 3 made a good package.